Product Uses Include
The actin binding protein spin-down assay kit provides G- or F-actin plus positive (α-actinin ) and negative (Bovine Serum Albumin, BSA) binding control proteins. Actin binding occurs when there is an affinity for any site of actin. F-actin binding can be measured by using a spin down method. In this way centrifugation is used to separate F-actin from G-actin by differential sedimentation. F-actin binding proteins will co-sediment with actin filaments and form a pellet at the bottom of the centrifugation tube. Proteins with F -actin bundling activity can be detected since they will cause the F-actin to sediment at lower centrifugal forces than normal (14,000 x g vs 150,000 x g). F-actin severing proteins, G-actin binding proteins or non-actin binding proteins will stay in the supernatant. Severing proteins will be expected if more G-actin remains in the supernatant than in the negative control sample, and this activity should be tested further by measuring F-actin length distributions before and after adding the test protein. G-actin binding proteins can be measured by adding the test protein to G-actin and inducing polymerization, if the test protein sequesters G-actin then during the spin-down assay more actin will be left in the supernatant compared with the control.
Actin can exist in two forms: Globular subunit (G-actin) and Filamentous polymer (F-actin) (See the About Actin page for more information). Both forms of actin interact with a plethora of proteins in the cell. To date there are over 50 distinct classes of Actin-Binding Proteins (ABPs), and the inventory is still far from complete. Actin Binding Proteins allow the actin cytoskeleton to respond rapidly to cellular and extracellular signals and are integral to cytoskeletal involvement in many cellular processes. These include cell shape and motility, muscle contraction, intracellular trafficking, cell pathogenesis and signal transduction.
This kit contains skeletal muscle actin (Cat. # AKL99). The same kit is also available with non-muscle actin (Cat. # APHL99), see Cat. # BK013. The non-muscle actin spin-down kit may be more appropriate to use to study actin binding proteins from non-muscle tissues.
The kit contains sufficient materials for 30-100 assays depending on assay volume. The following reagents are included:
The actin binding protein spin-down assay kit was used to study the actin binding and bundling activities of α-actinin (cat. # AT01). α-Actinin was shown to bundle F-actin and make the F-actin sediment at 14,000 x g (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Actin bundling assay using kit BK001. F-actin was incubated alone or together with α-actinin or BSA. Bundled F-actin was pelleted by a 14,000 x g centrifugation and pellets (P) and supernatants (S) were run on an SDS-PAGE gel. Only in the presence of the F-actin bundling protein α-actinin is actin pelleted at this centrifugation speed.
|Yasuda, Hidenori et al.||Tacrolimus ameliorates podocyte injury by restoring FK506 binding protein 12 (FKBP12) at actin cytoskeleton||The FASEB Journal||2021||ISSN 1530--6860|
|Cousin, M A et al.||Pathogenic SPTBN1 variants cause an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental syndrome||Nature …||2021||Article Link|
|Duan, Xudong et al.||Essential role of the endocytic site-associated protein Ecm25 in stress-induced cell elongation||Cell Reports||2021||ISSN 2211-1247|
|Lu, Yi Ju et al.||Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase 3 regulates actin cytoskeleton organization and immunity||Nature Communications||2020||ISSN 2041-1723|
|Alburquerque-González, Begoña et al.||New role of the antidepressant imipramine as a Fascin1 inhibitor in colorectal cancer cells||Experimental and Molecular Medicine||2020||ISSN 2092-6413|
|Laitila, Jenni et al.||A nebulin super-repeat panel reveals stronger actin binding toward the ends of the super-repeat region||Muscle and Nerve||2019||ISSN 1097-4598|
|Balta, Emre et al.||Spatial oxidation of L-plastin downmodulates actin-based functions of tumor cells||Nature Communications||2019||ISSN 2041-1723|
|Fu, Chuntang et al.||JMJD3 regulates CD4+ T cell trafficking by targeting actin cytoskeleton regulatory gene Pdlim4||Journal of Clinical Investigation||2019||ISSN 1558-8238|
|Kumar, M. Nagaraj et al.||Low water potential and AT14A-like1 (AFL1) effects on endocytosis and actin filament organization||Plant Physiology||2019||ISSN 1532-2548|
|Wang, Guang et al.||Rab7 regulates primary cilia disassembly through cilia excision||Journal of Cell Biology||2019||ISSN 1540-8140|
|Afreen, Sana et al.||Altered Cytoskeletal Composition and Delayed Neurite Elongation in tau 45-230-Expressing Hippocampal Neurons||Neuroscience||2019||ISSN 1873--7544|
|Schaffer, Ashleigh E. et al.||Biallelic loss of human CTNNA2, encoding αN-catenin, leads to ARP2/3 complex overactivity and disordered cortical neuronal migration||Nature Genetics||2018||ISSN 1546-1718|
|Wen, Qing et al.||Actin nucleator Spire 1 is a regulator of ectoplasmic specialization in the testis||Cell Death and Disease||2018||ISSN 2041-4889|
|Da’as, Sahar I. et al.||Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-linked variants of cardiac myosin-binding protein C3 display altered molecular properties and actin interaction||Biochemical Journal||2018||ISSN 1470-8728|
|Cervero, Pasquale et al.||Lymphocyte-specific protein 1 regulates mechanosensory oscillation of podosomes and actin isoform-based actomyosin symmetry breaking||Nature Communications||2018||ISSN 2041-1723|
|Bardai, Farah H. et al.||A conserved cytoskeletal signaling cascade mediates neurotoxicity of FTDP-17 tau mutations in vivo||Journal of Neuroscience||2018||ISSN 1529-2401|
|Wu, Tongbin et al.||HSPB7 is indispensable for heart development by modulating actin filament assembly||Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America||2017||ISSN 1091-6490|
|Guan, Liying et al.||The Calponin Family Member CHDP-1 Interacts with Rac/CED-10 to Promote Cell Protrusions||PLoS Genetics||2016||ISSN 1553-7404|
|Yan, Yi et al.||Augmented AMPK activity inhibits cell migration by phosphorylating the novel substrate Pdlim5||Nature Communications||2015||ISSN 2041-1723|
|Szeto, Sandy G.Y. et al.||Phosphorylation of filamin A by Cdk1 regulates filamin A localization and daughter cell separation||Experimental Cell Research||2015||ISSN 1090-2422|
|Kumeta, Masahiro et al.||Caprice/MISP is a novel F-actin bundling protein critical for actin-based cytoskeletal reorganizations||Genes to Cells||2014||ISSN 1365-2443|
|Mokbel, Nancy et al.||K7del is a common TPM2 gene mutation associated with nemaline myopathy and raised myofibre calcium sensitivity||Brain||2013||ISSN 1460-2156|
|Wang, Tzu Fan et al.||Identification and characterization of the actin-binding motif of Phostensin||International Journal of Molecular Sciences||2012||ISSN 1422-0067|
|Lai, Ning Sheng et al.||Phostensin caps to the pointed end of actin filaments and modulates actin dynamics||Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications||2009||ISSN 0006-291X|
|Meira, Maria et al.||Memo is a cofilin-interacting protein that influences PLCγ1 and cofilin activities, and is essential for maintaining directionality during ErbB2-induced tumor-cell migration||Journal of Cell Science||2009||ISSN 0021-9533|
|McCloskey, Diana T. et al.||Hypotonic activation of short ClC3 isoform is modulated by direct interaction between its cytosolic C-terminal tail and subcortical actin filaments||Journal of Biological Chemistry||2007||ISSN 0021-9258|
|Terry-Lorenzo, Ryan T. et al.||Neurabin/protein phosphatase-1 complex regulates dendritic spine morphogenesis and maturation||Molecular Biology of the Cell||2005||ISSN 1059-1524|
|Takeshita, Norio et al.||CsmA, a Class V Chitin Synthase with a Myosin Motor-like Domain, Is Localized through Direct Interaction with the Actin Cytoskeleton in Aspergillus nidulans||Molecular Biology of the Cell||2005||ISSN 1059-1524|
|Kumar, Narendra et al.||Association of villin with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate regulates the actin cytoskeleton||The Journal of biological chemistry||2004||ISSN 0021--9258|
|Torgler, Catherine N. et al.||Tensin Stabilizes Integrin Adhesive Contacts in Drosophila||Developmental Cell||2004|
|Banerjee, Jayashree et al.||Identification of a Novel Sequence in PDZ-RhoGEF That Mediates Interaction with the Actin Cytoskeleton||Molecular Biology of the Cell||2004||ISSN 1059-1524|
|Goryunov, Dmitry et al.||Studying cytolinker proteins||Methods in Cell Biology||2004||ISSN 0091-679X|
|Oliver, Carey J. et al.||Targeting Protein Phosphatase 1 (PP1) to the Actin Cytoskeleton: the Neurabin I/PP1 Complex Regulates Cell Morphology||Molecular and Cellular Biology||2002||ISSN 0270--7306|
|Hildebrand, Jeffrey D. et al.||Shroom, a PDZ Domain–Containing Actin-Binding Protein, Is Required for Neural Tube Morphogenesis in Mice||Cell||1999||ISSN 0092--8674|
Question 1: What are optimal conditions for preparing my actin binding test protein?
Answer 1: Make the test protein at the highest possible concentration in an actin compatible buffer such as a HEPES or phosphate buffer. The high concentration (preferably >20 μM) is necessary to optimize the opportunity to detect interactions between actin and the test protein. In some cases the Kd (dissociation constant) of an actin binding protein/actin interaction may be so low as not to be detectable by protein assay of the pellet; however, the affect on the actin in the reaction mix may be enough to be detected by differences in the amount of actin in the pellet and supernatant versus the negative control. We also recommend centrifuging the test protein at 150,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C to remove denatured proteins and cellular debris. This is not necessary if other steps (e.g., affinity column purification) have been taken to purify the test protein. After the high-speed centrifugation, remove the supernatant and place on ice. This is the test protein stock.
The total ionic strength should be below 50 mM, this is due to the character of actin association whereby it’s mainly ionic and hence will be affected by medium and high salt buffers. A good starting buffer is 20 mM Hepes pH 7.4 plus 20 mM KCl, plus protease inhibitors, phosphatase inhibitors and any co-factors that are necessary. A low salt actin polymerization 10x buffer can be made with 20 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM ATP thus allowing the salt to be kept low in the final reaction.
Additional issues to consider are that a (i) test protein cofactor may be necessary, (ii) a factor in the assay could be actively inhibiting interactions, (iii) the test protein could have a preference for a different type of actin, or (iv) the test protein may be at a low concentration in tissue extracts.
To address some of these potential problems, reagents can be added to remove inhibitors, such as EGTA (Part #BSEG-01) for calcium. In the case of motor proteins, the ATP/Mg2+ combination will dissociate the motor from the F-actin hence a non-hydrolyzable analog such as AMPPNP is used at 1 mM. An actin affinity column can be used to concentrate and isolate more of the test protein. Finally, different pH conditions may improve binding between the actin and actin binding protein (e.g. alpha-actinin’s pH optima is 7.0).
Question 2: Can this kit be used to determine binding affinities between actin and actin binding proteins?
Answer 2: Binding affinity (Kd) can be estimated from the spin-down assay by titrating the test protein concentration between 0.2 and 20 μM and finding the concentration where half the original protein is in the pellet.
Question 3: Can cell lysates be used with this kit as the source of a test protein?
Answer 3: Yes, cell lysates can be used as the source of the test protein. However, Cytoskeleton does not recommend this as the purity and concentration of the protein will often be too low to interact with actin. Also, the lysates will contain additional accessory proteins and multiple phosphatases and proteases that can interfere or alter the interactions between actin and actin binding proteins. If lysates are to be used, we recommend the following:
Although this kit is designed for use with pure proteins or compounds, some researchers have added extracts with good results. Generally researchers use over-expressed proteins and a wild-type control extract similarly over-expressed. It is necessary to make a 10 mg/ml protein extract and then use 1/3rd volume of this to 2/3rd volume of actin at 1 mg/ml. In this way there is a high enough concentration of protein to make a difference. The extraction buffer should be 20 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 20 mM KCl, plus any co-factors for your protein, and a protease inhibitor cocktail such as our Cat# PIC02. Phosphatase inhibitors can also be added. Rinse the cells with an ice cold buffer and lyse cells with a 25g bent over syringe needle or other device. The pH can alter F-actin binding properties of actin binding proteins (ABPs) by 0 to 100%. It is a good idea to test pH 6.5, 7.5 and 8.5 for extract preparation. The control cell line is very critical because potential ABPs could appear in the pellet by other routes; for example, denaturing or aggregation with other cellular proteins. The total ionic strength should be kept to below 50 mM in order not to salt off any potential ABPs.
If you have any questions concerning this product, please contact our Technical Service department at email@example.com